Spiritual guidance for anyone seeking a path to God. explorefaith.org

 

Explore God's Love Explore Your Faith Explore the Church Explore Who We Are  

Home
>
Jim Wallis' Featured Contributions > "The Shackles of Ideology"
 


RELATED LINKS

Join our mailing list
Join our mailing list
 
Send this page to a friend

Support explorefaith.org

Give us your feedback

 

Being Real
Spiritual Tools
for Authentic Living

FAITH and LIFE

Signposts:
Daily Devotions

Reflections for Your Journey
Register for a
weekly reflection

Send a free e-card


Voices of Faith


explorefaith.org does not advocate or endorse any political opinions
expressed below. It is our hope that this information will “make you think”
about how to respond to religious and political ideology.

The Shackles of Ideology
Mr. Jim Wallis

(This sermon is also available in audio.)

We have a political problem that is also a spiritual one. Let me read from Ephesians, Chapter 6:

10 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his power. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For our struggle is not against enemies of blood and flesh, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers of this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)

Or my favorite translation of that is “against principalities and powers.” More than flesh and blood, there is a collective kind of concentration of evil in high places and they’re called “principalities.”

I want to suggest this morning, in our short Lenten time, that ideology is a principality. Ideology polarizes and paralyzes our politics.

I live in Washington, D.C. Here’s what the politicians do on both sides. They take a problem and they want to do two things with it: one, make us afraid of it; second, blame it on the other side. They never get back around to solving the problem, but they want to make you afraid and blame the other side. Then they take a poll to see whose spinning won. An election is just the last poll.

The media, which I’ve been doing a lot of lately…they make it worse. Did you know that all of our problems just have two sides? Think about it. Youth violence. Oh, it’s just left and right. Drugs, parenting, overcoming poverty, the environment, the ethics of war. Well, there’s just left, and there’s right.

I’ve been doing a lot of these pre-interviews lately. They’re auditions to see if the two talking heads have enough conflict to make good TV.

Ideology polarizes, paralyzes politics, and prevents our finding solutions. Prevents, obstructs our finding solutions. And our kids just fall between the cracks. You think the poor are trapped? I’ll tell you where they’re trapped: the poor are trapped in the debate about poverty. That’s where they’re trapped. And one in five of our children remain in poverty. One in three children of color. While the two sides just blame each other for the problem and then go home to very nice dinners.

Ideology also seduces religion. It makes religion ideological, predictable, partisan. It prevents the emergence of prophetic faith, which could possibly help a nation find what the Catholics call “common ground.” Could help a nation find common ground by moving to higher ground--“The common good” in Catholic social teaching.

But no, we have a political seduction of religion called “the religious right.” And, whenever anybody challenges that seduction, the media right away calls them--as they did my book in the [New York] Times last week--the religious left! Of course, you must be one, or the other. Just take your pick.

The two parties both get it wrong. Religion doesn’t fit neatly into categories of right and left, liberal or conservative.

The right side, they are comfortable with the language of religion, faith…God….they act like they own the territory. Own God, maybe. Then they narrow all the moral values to just two: abortion and gay marriage. That’s it, end of conversation. There are only two religious issues, you know. Just two. Those are two important ones which we need a fuller, richer, deeper conversation about on both sides. But my goodness…only two?

I’m an evangelical Christian. When I find three thousand verses in my Bible about poor people, I gotta pay attention. Fighting poverty, therefore, is a moral value. Protecting God’s creation, the environment, is a moral value. The ethics of war: when we go to war, how we go to war, whether we tell the truth about going to war. That’s a moral value and a religious issue.

This book I’ve been touring around with is called God’s Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It. Cause the right just says two and the left says, "Oh my goodness, we’re nervous about religion. We’re uncomfortable. We think the separation of church and state means the banishing of moral values from public discourse. Any kind of religious talk."

Where would we be--I know what city I’m in…I’ve been to the museum--Where would we be if the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had kept his faith to himself?

A party that was linked to the Civil Rights movement led by black churches now is successfully portrayed as the “secular” party. Hostile to religion. “Oh we have faith,” they say, “but don’t worry, it won’t affect anything.” And so they cede the territory, concede the whole topic of values and faith to the other side. And they define it by appealing to the faith and fears of an important constituency.

And religion--which has fueled and driven every major social reform movement in our history: abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, child labor law reform and, most famously, civil rights--becomes just an ideological prop for one side or the other. We can do better. We have to do better, and a whole generation of young people are hoping that we do.

I’ve done a lot of TV shows the last few months and weeks, doing some more this afternoon. Some are fun, some not-so-fun. The most fun was one hosted by a guy named Jon Stewart, The Daily Show. How many of you know it? Your kids know, if you don’t. Most American young people under 30 get their news from Jon Stewart more than all the networks. So he came back to the dressing room and I could tell that he’d read the book cover to cover. Most of them don’t, to tell you the truth. He did. He asked smart questions about global poverty, aid, trade, debt, how in fact we can make a difference on this big issue.

He asked smart questions. “I’m an outsider,” he said, “I may ask silly questions.” So I said, “Just ask what you want, Jon.” So he did, and we had fun. He started by saying (we’re on the show now…his youthful live audience there and I know millions are watching of the same ilk) and he says “Now, you want to apply religion, like the teachings of Jesus, like, to politics?” I could feel millions thinking to themselves “Oh no! He’s got some wacko right-wing evangelical on that’s gonna ruin my show! My favorite show!” I could just feel them. And so I said, “Yeah, Jon, I don’t think Jesus’ first two priorities would have been a capital gains tax cut and the occupation of Iraq.”

And a whole generation whooped and hollered for progressive religion. They would go on to cheer Matthew 25 before we were done. “My conversion…” they cheered Matthew 25… “as you’ve done to the least of these, you’ve done to me.” YEAH! YEAH! YEAH!

We had some good Christian-Jewish banter. I said “Jon, you’re for moral values, right?” And he hesitated. I said “Well, maybe not.” He said “Do I get weekends off?” He asked me something and I said “Good question, Jon,” and he said “You mean, good question for a Jewish guy?” He said “I know we’re not going to heaven but could we have a neighborhood nearby yours? We’ll keep it clean, I promise!” And I said, I inscribed the book: “Jon, the Biblical prophets use humor and satirizing political leaders and truth-telling to make their point. You do those all very well. Maybe you’re in the tradition of the Biblical prophets. He goes….ooh….all soft and mushy.

Afterwards he said…he put his hand on my arm and said “You know, I’m pretty secular. Pretty secular. But I like this, I…I…I want to….Can we keep talking? Could I be involved somehow in this?”

Then the e-mails came. Hundreds, then thousands, of young people who said one of two things. “I lost my faith because of the religious right or what I saw some Christian TV preacher say or do or…” they named all the names. You know the names. “But I feel like maybe, maybe, maybe, I could have some faith again.” Or they said, and this is amazing, they said this over and over: “I didn’t know that Christians could care about poverty. And care about the environment. Or be against the war in Iraq. I didn’t know.”

They’re outside the hearing of churches like this and many of our…I mean, the Pope is hardly a liberal religious leader. He was against the war in Iraq. They hadn’t even heard it from him. They’re outside the sound of our voices. They’re in a culture that says “religion equals right wing.” I would object to it equaling left wing either but no one says that.

And they heard for the first time, in a little six-minute segment, that a progressive religious option was available. And they said “Maybe there’s some hope for me. Maybe there’s some hope for me.”

There has been a monologue on faith in politics for a long time. A monologue by the religious right. In the past month, I've been at bookstore signings in Austin, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. Over 400 people have shown up at these signings for just a little book….and they haven’t even read the book. It’s not about a book. They want to believe there’s another way to do this.

It’s taught me that the monologue by the religious right is over and a new dialogue has finally begun.

Who’s coming?:

Evangelical Christians who don’t feel represented by Jerry Falwell;

Catholics, who don’t feel spoken for by a few Catholic bishops who say there is only one issue on which Catholics can vote or care about…abandon all the rest of your Catholic social teaching;

Mainline Protestants, who feel left out of the conversation entirely and disrespected in their faith, like they don’t even count;

Black churches. Black Christians who feel like this is such a white conversation when they say “the evangelicals think, "Well, I got kicked out of my little evangelical church in Detroit when I was 14 years old, over the issue of race, and I got taken in by black churches and guess what?

They were the other evangelical church. Loved the same Jesus, read the same Bible, sang out of the same hymn book and made it sound so much better than we did!" They’re not in the conversation.

Lots of Jews coming out…rabbis…lots of Jews. They know Micah and Isaiah and Jeremiah are in the book. Abraham, Joshua, Heschel, but they’re wanting to be in this conversation.

Muslims are coming.

A whole lot of young people, some of whom say, in question times,“Thank you for making me feel included tonight. I’m an agnostic. I’m not religiously affiliated but I felt spiritually inspired by tonight because I care about moral values!”

We need a national discourse, a moral discourse, on our public life. Lincoln was right - you can’t claim God’s blessing for your nation, its policies. You can’t say God is on your side. That leads to all the bad stuff in politics: overconfidence, hubris, triumphalism, and always bad foreign policy.

[Lincoln] said, we should pray earnestly, worry if we’re on God’s side … that leads to things we miss in politics: like humility, penitence, reflection, and accountability.

Lincoln had it right, and King did it best - Bible in one hand, Constitution in the other hand. He never claimed that religion had a monopoly on morality.

[King] just expressed his faith and invited everybody to the party. Whether Baptist like him, or Catholics, or Jewish like Rabbi Heschel, or his agnostic supporters who are still agnostic to this day, but say that was the spiritual highpoint of their lives.

We need a new moral conversation about politics. It should be about values, moral values…that should be the future of our politics.

Not the religiosity of candidates; whether they pray, how many times a day do they pray, how many more Bible verses does one know than the other. No. But what the moral compass is.

What is our moral compass? If faith shapes that, let’s talk about how it shapes our moral compass.

There’s a hunger in this country for a new conversation about politics. A hunger for a politics of solutions. And finally, a hunger for a politics, not of fear …hunger for a politics of hope.

My Bible says “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” And my best paraphrase of that is “Hope is believing in spite of the evidence, and then watching the evidence change.”

Copyright ©2005 Jim Wallis

Excerpted from a sermon preached February 14, 2005, for the Lenten Noonday Preaching Series at Calvary Episcopal Church, Memphis, TN .




 

 


(Return to Top)

 

Send this article to a friend.

Home | Explore God's Love | Explore Your Faith | Explore the Church | Who We Are
Reflections | Stepping Stones | Oasis | Lifelines | Bulletin Board | Search |Contact Us |
 
  Search  
Copyright ©1999-2007 explorefaith.org